Framer vs Unbounce: Best Landing Page Builder for Web3
Grooic
September 30, 2025
Tools
The choice between Framer and Unbounce shapes how effectively your Web3 landing page converts visitors into token holders, DAO members, or investors. Framer shines in design flexibility and animations, while Unbounce excels at rapid A/B testing and campaign scaling. This comparison shows where each platform stands for blockchain and crypto projects.
Why Web3 Projects Need Specialized Landing Pages

Web3 startups compete in markets where trust, speed, and community adoption determine survival. Unlike traditional SaaS, blockchain projects rely on:
Wallet integrations for token sales.
Transparent tokenomics for investor trust.
Countdown timers and staking models to create urgency.
Roadmap visibility to strengthen credibility.
Generic website builders often miss these. That’s why platforms like Framer Crypto Templates and Unbounce Crypto Templates exist to package proven UX flows designed for blockchain.
Framer: Motion-First Design for Storytelling
Framer is the best fit for Web3 teams focused on brand identity, animations, and immersive design. Its strength lies in presenting complex tokenomics or NFT concepts through micro-interactions and scroll-based storytelling.
Perfect for token launches and NFT collections needing visual engagement.
Motion-rich sections that explain staking, governance, and DAO voting clearly.
Easy collaboration for design teams who already work in Figma - Framer workflows.
If your launch strategy revolves around hype-building, animated journeys, or immersive storytelling, Framer helps capture that energy while keeping conversions in focus.
Unbounce: Conversion Optimization at Scale

Unbounce is the top choice for campaigns that require testing, data-driven iteration, and marketing automation. Web3 projects with active paid campaigns or aggressive growth funnels often lean on Unbounce’s CRO tools.
Dynamic text replacement for traffic segmentation.
Built-in A/B testing to validate token presale CTAs.
Drag-and-drop CRO blocks like countdowns, wallets, and validator proof sections.
For meme coins, staking offers, or referral campaigns, Unbounce provides speed and performance. Marketers don’t need developers to launch, test, optimize, repeat.
Feature Comparison: Framer vs Unbounce for Web3
Feature | Framer | Unbounce |
---|---|---|
Design Flexibility | Motion-rich storytelling, high customization | Functional templates, CRO-focused |
Best Use Case | Token launches, NFT storytelling | Paid campaigns, presale funnels |
Conversion Tools | Basic, requires add-ons or custom builds | Built-in A/B testing, CRO automation |
Integration | Easy with Web3 wallets via embed | Marketing automation & analytics native |
Learning Curve | Moderate for non-designers | Easy for marketers, limited animations |
When to Choose Framer vs Unbounce
Choose Framer if your Web3 brand depends on visual storytelling, NFTs, or DAO identity.
Choose Unbounce if your project thrives on agile campaigns, quick iterations, and CRO testing.
Some teams even use both Framer for the main brand site and Unbounce for conversion funnels.
If your team is migrating from one platform to another, Grooic’s Platform Migration Services help preserve design and CRO integrity while switching tools.
Frequently Asked Questions
Want to Launch Faster?
Get a high-converting landing page instantly with our premium templates.